Practical documentation · Authorized use only
SMBMap
SMBMap helps an authorized team inventory SMB shares and effective permissions. Use it with a dedicated least-privilege test account where needed, avoid reading sensitive content by default, and preserve only necessary metadata as evidence.
Start safely and get useful results
Best for
- • SMB share inventory
- • Permission validation
Not for
- • Data collection
- • Remote command execution
Before you run anything
- • Document the authorized target, time window, success criteria, data-handling rules, and a named stop contact before you begin.
- • Confirm the installed version with the tool’s version or help command, then compare its documented behavior with the linked upstream project before relying on any option.
Practical workflows
Check an owned lab host without credentials
Scenario: Determine whether guest access is enabled in a disposable Samba lab.
smbmap -H 192.0.2.10Request a minimal host-level inventory against the approved lab address.
Expected use: Expect share names and access hints; validate permissions with the service owner.
Validate a dedicated test account
Scenario: Confirm that a least-privilege account lacks write access to sensitive test shares.
Use a dedicated synthetic test account through the tool’s approved interactive credential flow; never put a password in a command line.Record the intended permission expectation and protect both authentication logs and any resulting share metadata.
Expected use: Compare observed rights with the access model; do not browse or copy content unless separately authorized.
Interpret results like an analyst
- • Read/write indicators are point-in-time effective rights and can vary by share path.
- • Unexpected write access should trigger owner validation and least-privilege remediation.
Common mistakes and operating tips
Avoid
- • Using real passwords on the command line where shell history can retain them.
- • Treating share visibility as authorization to enumerate or download data.
Operational discipline
- • Treat command output as evidence, not a conclusion: retain the command, version, scope, timestamp, and a redacted result in the engagement record.
- • Start with the smallest safe scope, validate expected behavior in a lab or pilot, then expand only when the authorization and monitoring plan support it.
Verify against the current upstream
Tool behavior and release syntax can change. Treat this guide as practical operating context, then verify version-specific details against the upstream project before an assessment.
Open authoritative upstream documentation